top of page
Ajia Richardson

50 Cent Makes Power Move & Sues Jeweler, TraxNYC, for Trademark Infringement: Right of Publicity


Rapper and entrepreneur 50 Cent, born Curtis Jackson, has filed a trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit against Trax Agadjani, owner of the jewelry company TraxNYC. The claim centers on the alleged unauthorized use of 50 Cent’s likeness and goodwill to promote jewelry that closely resembles one of his custom chains. In the lawsuit, 50 Cent argues that TraxNYC used a knockoff version of his chain in their promotional material, misleading consumers into thinking he endorsed the product. Crucially, 50 Cent never purchased jewelry from TraxNYC nor authorized them to capitalize on his reputation.


The suit demands at least $5 million in damages and seeks to bar Agadjani and his associates from using or imitating 50 Cent’s name or likeness. This lawsuit hinges on important legal principles surrounding the Right of Publicity and federal trademark law, specifically protections under the Lanham Act.


Understanding the Right of Publicity

At the heart of 50 Cent’s case is the Right of Publicity, which is the legal right that allows individuals, particularly celebrities, to control the commercial use of their identity. This right encompasses a person’s name, likeness, voice, and other attributes that evoke their identity, such as distinctive clothing or signature jewelry.


The Right of Publicity prevents third parties from exploiting someone’s identity for commercial gain without their consent. In the case of 50 Cent, TraxNYC is accused of using a chain that closely mimics one of his custom pieces—effectively associating the design with 50 Cent’s persona to boost sales. This association could lead customers to believe that 50 Cent endorsed the product when, in reality, he did not.


The Right of Publicity has explicitly evolved to protect celebrities from unauthorized commercial exploitation. It recognizes that a celebrity’s identity holds significant value, and unauthorized use of it—whether in name, likeness, or other identifiable attributes—constitutes an invasion of that right.


Key Elements of a Right of Publicity Claim

For 50 Cent’s Right of Publicity claim to succeed, he must prove four key elements:


  1. The defendant’s use of the plaintiff’s identity: In this case, TraxNYC allegedly used a chain design resembling 50 Cent’s custom jewelry, which is closely linked to his identity as a celebrity.

  2. Appropriation of the plaintiff’s name or likeness to the defendant’s advantage: 50 Cent has accused TraxNYC of using his likeness (via his custom chain design) to sell jewelry and commercially benefit from the association with the rapper.

  3. Lack of consent: 50 Cent did not authorize TraxNYC to use his likeness or goodwill in any way to promote or sell their jewelry.

  4. Resulting injury: The lawsuit argues that TraxNYC harmed 50 Cent’s reputation and brand by the unauthorized use of his likeness, and seeks $5 million in damages as compensation for this injury.


The Lanham Act and False Endorsement Claims

50 Cent’s lawsuit also references the Lanham Act, a federal law that provides protections against false advertising and misrepresentation of products. Under the Lanham Act, using someone’s identity in a way that creates a false impression of endorsement is illegal. By using a chain that closely resembles 50 Cent’s, TraxNYC may have violated this provision by misleading consumers into believing that the jewelry had 50 Cent’s backing.


The case emphasizes how the Right of Publicity goes beyond just the use of a person’s name or image. It protects the full scope of a person’s identity and anything that might evoke or suggest that identity can fall under its protection. For celebrities like 50 Cent, controlling the narrative around their brand is vital, and legal action like this serves as a reminder that unauthorized exploitation of a public figure’s likeness can carry significant consequences.


Future Considerations

50 Cent’s lawsuit against TraxNYC underscores the importance of respecting the Right of Publicity in the commercial sphere. The case reflects the need for businesses to carefully navigate how they use celebrity likenesses, even indirectly, in their marketing. As the digital age makes it easier for independent artists and brands to promote their products, understanding these legal boundaries has never been more critical.


Ready to Protect Your Brand?

If you’re thinking about getting a trademark or have questions about how to protect your creative works, we’re here to help! Schedule a Trademark Discovery Call with our office today. Let’s make sure your brand shines bright and stays safe!


Remember, your ideas and your brand deserve protection. Don’t wait—let’s get started!


Want to learn more about all JMA LAW has to offer your business? Head over to our website at jmalaw.org

7 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page